A good deal for England when ....

1) The UK contribution will go up ( but the press releases allow people to think it will go down )
2) Its only an agreed common position ( remember the non veto veto Dave used )
3) The EU parliament wants a secret vote to ensure more EUGeld is stolen from hard working English families to blow on the EU's unapproved accounts and deep seated corruption.

Has cast iron "I can't tell the difference between debt and deficit" 1st from Oxford Dave tried to pull yet another fast one ? ( See Ursus defecating in the forest argument for details ).

Labour: the flood gates open were opened to win more votes

Why is there a shortage of housing in the South East ?

Why can't our youth get jobs ? (ok the Labour education system has a case to to answer here also.)

The answer to both is Labour opened the floodgates to immigration and they did it to germander future elections.

A bit extreme ? Do I need to put my tin foil hat back on ?

No because we all know this as it was reported in 2010. See here.

So when Red Ed gets out his dog whistle for white working class votes today remember he's just misleading you straight to your face (political lying)  about his past and future intention.

PS Note that the BBC ( in particular Radio 4 Today ) buys it all - doing its usual biased trick of reporting on something that is going to be said, so not allowing comeback from those who have a different take on events.

Student tuition fees - protesting for a left wing lie

The BBC is notorious for letting left wing commentators of the hook, and they were at their best again this morning (R4Today this morning) when interviewing some student union president or other who was trying the lie that student tuition fees mean education is only for the well off.

1) Education needs to be paid for. Either those who are about to join the middle classes pay for it - or those who don't get to University will have to pay. This point is almost never put to the self righteous left wing talking heads.
2) Anyone who aspires to go to University should be capable of understanding there is no risk to paying these fees with the special government loans. If your education doesn't lead to economic success you don't pay ! That's not putting off the poor - just the stupid. ( Indeed its perhaps a bad deal for the tax payer - but there you have it. )

But of course the real underlying truth is none of this is about students or education - it is about the great left wing fantasy of protesting ( an end in itself ) and politicising a generation who are just gullible enough to think whatever they are told to think and never to question.

Indeed a major criticism of the current education system must be what sort of robots are we turning out who can't get their heads around the basic facts and arguments ?

Now I know there are side issues on how those in Labour special Celtic heart lands don't have to pay for things, but get English taxpayers to allow them to free-load. But that is a separate issue.

Its time the NUS was seen for the narrow bigoted partisan Left wing training institution that it is. And perhaps time to attack it funding and the way it conscripts students. It may also be time to separate political activity in student unions from social, welfare and sports activities.

Michael Gove has shown the way - time to drain the left wing swamp that produces such moronic arguments to deceive people with.

The new Chinook's are just combat replacements

The UK is losing about 2 Chinooks a year at the moment.

It has just ordered 22 over 10 years. ( Note they will turn up when the US is willing to defer the ones its ordered from Boeing. )

That's loss replacement rate - and doesn't even cover the general wear and tear.

This from Gordon Brown who cut the UK helicopter budget by £1.4 billion when he thought no one would notice.

So folks is just spin again and re-announcements.

But it makes great cover for the desperate cuts to defence spending Brown is having to rush out to save a run on the bond markets.

PS Odd the BBC doesn't pick this up ( just kidding - of course its not odd at all after all the BBC is institutionally left wing )

Remeber "Blair denies 'Labour smear' over Tory cuts" - 2005 ?

For those who think that the final undeniable exposure of Labour's spin and smear operation just impacts personalities and "tittle tattle " ( Copyright 2009 The Prince of Darkness , use acknowledged ) consider the impact of the Blair/Brown smear and misrepresentation in 2005 of Conservative plans to reduce the rate of expansion of public spending. ( Personally I think this one has Gordon Brown's finger prints all over it ).

Unemployment would rise by 300k ! Teachers, Doctor's and Nurses would be fired en mass. Only Labour would guarantee the fantastically useless "New Deal".

Well we are all now going to pay the price of that distortion and Gordon Brown's plan to destroy the UK's fiances pursuing his political agenda ( a combination of stealth socialism and destruction of the state and personal ambition - ably helped by McPoison, Balls et al ).

If the Conservatives had won in 2005 we would have been in a far better condition to tackle the upcoming financial disaster facing the government. Instead the cuts will be arbitrary, panicked, unplanned, wasteful in themselves ( efficiency savings in Govt almost always seem to require spending yet more money ).

Labour and especially Brown's refusual to even allow rational debate in 2005 about government spending combined with its smears on Conservative spending and immigration plans ( both of which now have been shown to be the right course of action - anyone who denies this perhaps needs to book a session with Dolly Draper, who needs the work ).

Labour clung to power in 2005 through spin, smear, poison, lies and betrayal of our nation.

Mandelson is at the root of Liebour's evil

The Prince of Darkness ( aka Peter Mandelson - forced to resign twice from the Cabinet - sent of to Europe on a very high paid job and back for a third snout in the trough experience with Gordon Brown ) is trying the old Jedi mind trick on the media (aka spin).

He's announcing that the scandal over Labour's dirty tricks campaign run by Gordon Brown long term associates is over. And of course using standard Labour spin deceit techniques he tries to re-write history - most of which is hardly a week old. Get a load of this for pure evil and deception:

Lord Mandelson said ..... the prime minister had acted "so decisively and quickly in getting rid of him".

This is demonstrably not the case (Brown dithered and apparenetly accepted his old friends resignation only when the pressure was unbearable - when sacking for misconduct was surely required - I wonder if he keeps his gold plated public sector taxpayer funded pension as a result ? ) - but that doesn't stop Mandelson for one minute.

It will be interesting to see how all the MSM commentators who have been rushing out Damian McBride stories react to one of the Liebour Undead who hasn't yet been dispatched by Guido Von Hesling.

Remember the lies, spin deception all came in with the New Labour project and who was at its heart?

Of course the ever faithful BBC runs the story with the prominence that you would expect from the prince's favoured familiar, but unlike the old days on post 97 other views make it into the report - although way down in the article.

Update: Maybe this is the news story Lord Mandelmort is trying to bury with the above absurd statement ?

Despite all the spin and chaff being fired by Labour spin doctors the question of how the email really got out is still open. Since the effect of the email leak has been to strip Brown of man of the thugs who protected his position an internal Labour party source can't be ruled out.

Further: Seems I'm not the only one to wonder if the leaked emails aren't really a smoking gun re-starting the Blairite/Brown civil war.

What's a Brownie then ?

Is it a sort of chocolate flavoured cake ? Or a mini- girl guide ? Well of course both are true, but from now on its also the name for the lies and misleading statements that Gordon Brown tells people to their faces thanks to Fraser Nelson over at the Coffee house.

Fraser picks up on a number of the untruths Brown spouted in his speech, some of which I've spotted and other will have spotted also.

This key thing is what does this tell us about the man ?

Its quite simple - he's unfit to hold public office.
H/T in passing to Iain Dale's diary's daily blog summary for the link to Fraser's post.

Update: Look s like David Cameron's going for Brown on his ability to be truthful also. Quite right

Tractor production to rise in the NHS !!

The Dour Leader has announced that through his genius tractor production will rise in the NHS forever and ever !

Out will go all the things people mention when they say they don't trust Labour on the NHS and in will come things to do the same thing, but that will be harder for people to spot.

For example Nice will approve drugs faster and everyone will have the same access ! But of course we know this can't be the full picture as the money doesn't exist to fund all this ( after all its all been sent to Wales and Scotland to pay for the Celtic socialist utopia's ), so the rationing will be hidden behind stealthy announcements about what works and what doesn't. All health trusts will be forced to do the same thing - so that no one can spot alternative practice or other drugs being used ! We will sell this soviet crushing of initiative as abandoning the postcode lottery - hail the wise and all seeing Dour Leader for his monocular vision !!!

Targets ( mentioned by David Cameron) are unpopular and so will be replaced by quality ! Of course the government will define the terms by which quality will be determined - in effect still setting the targets - but we hope no one will notice.

The enemies of the people, GPs, will be attacked by rounding the traitors up in polyclinics (an old soviet idea from the 1920's ) and making the remainders suffer from patient satisfaction forms ! Slowly they will be replace by more compliant, and less likely to spot expensive diseases, Nurse practitioners.

The Dour Leader cannot be criticised for all this as he will hide behind the profession of Lord Darzi. Some may call this cowardice - but now thanks to the NHS database we know who they are and have cut of any life support they might get in the future.

And of course these 'reforms' will apply only to the English - who failed - like the people who voted for the MDC in Zimbabwe that comrade Mugabe has had to 'persuade'- to vote for the Dour Leader's party at the last election, so the less of them there are in the future the greater the socialist victory will be !

Hail the Dour Leader - Tractor production is up and will rise forever under his wise vision and the NHS Constitution* !

* The word constitution does not imply referendums of any sort - and even if we promised one we would rat on it anyway - that's our moral compass again....

More deception from Gordon, but is his subconscious trying to tell us something ?

Mr Brown has been told that the voters public are worried about the economy. So he's decided to tell everyone he's on their side. The faithful puppy dog article confirming this can be found at the left wing BBC here.

Gordon is of course telling more whoppers and sometimes you have to wonder why (Blair knew how to reassure without actually saying anything of substance ). Here are a few from the BBC's article:

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has said he understands people's fears over the economy and insisted that keeping it on track was his "sole focus". Of course the Prime Minster could never be solely focused on the economy, at least not one who was sane and aware of his duties - that's the Chancellors job and even he has other things to think about. He could have said "Our top priority", or a blairesque "Economy, Economy, Economy", but instead Brown opts for the untruth. Sometime I think his subconscious is desperately trying to get a message out to us with these small untruths and mistakes.

"We are on the side of home owners, business and individuals," he said. That's just bullshit - look at the HIPS , stamp duty raises, the savage anti-Southerner council tax rises, the abolition of the 10% tax rate etc etc.

"We are going to continue, as we did when faced with difficult decisions in 1998 and 2004, to do everything in our power to keep the economy moving forward." What's this moving forward idea ? Again its like he's trying to tell us something without using the words. Moving forwards is an almost meaningless term and portrays the lack of confidence in using any other terms like growth for example.

Update Three Line Whip - also picked up on the "sole focus" lie.

The rape of the British State by Gordon Brown

We are told you always have the right to say no and that no means no.

Well not to Gordon Brown. He promised not to betray Britain to the EU Constitution without the peoples consent in his election manifesto. But then he hit on the rouse of claiming the same measures, using different words didn't amount to the same thing.

Its like saying rape isn't rape because you use a different word but carry out the same act.

The British state has had its sovereignty violated, its democracy defiled, by the man who claimed he had a moral compass and wanted straight politics. ( And then went on in PMQs as he so often does to spread further lies about the political manifesto of an opponent - not the first time he's done that either.)

Democracy cannot function when politicians lie like Gordon Brown does from his position as the unelected leader of the country.

As the state cannot reject the cancerous activities of the current quisling Labour government then the state itself will lose its legitimacy - just as it is handing its powers over to a foreign and alien power in Brussels.

Often the word shameless is used to describe New Labour and Gordon Brown - but some how its doesn't seem enough, they are traitors.

Isn't anti-royalism republicanism ?

The root of Labours failure and their electoral success over the last ten years has been their ability to lie and believe their own lies.

They use language to avoid uncomfortable truths and to hide reality from the public. We know their approach by the word 'spin'.

So get a load of this Labour are trying to accuse UKIP of anti-Royalism ( which is of course Republicanism - the default position of most Labour MPs is they suffered an outburst of honesty or if somebody put sodium pentathlon in the tea urn in the commons - you know that could be an idea, but I digress ).

Why - because they don't approve of the next in line to the thrown advocating removing powers from that throne to hand them over to the colleagues in Brussels ( known as treason ).

Labour just love deceit. They accuse another group of the thing that is at the heart of their movement by a bit of verbal gymnastics. But they gave up all pretence at morality and integrity when they became New Labour - which is really Stealth Labour. They have learnt never to be direct or honest with the people - hence why a barrister for Gordon Brown can argue that no one should believe their manifesto promises.

And they love inventing new ways of hiding what they truly believe - today that is anti-Royalism.

How to deflect the truth

The following is a question from the new No 10 Mc'A' level qualification that is deemed to have equivalence to a nobel prize and PhD in Physics according to Ed Balls and co:

National No10 communications exam - sample paper:

Person A sends a letter to person B.
Person B ignores the letter and throws it away saying "I'm not bloody answering that or taking any notice of Tories" - as usual. ( Candidates are reminded this is a hypothetical question - and you can't prove otherwise . )

Question:Later a scandal emerges and it turns out that A says they warned B about that scandal. How can B deny it yet stay within the bounds of the truth ?

Model answer:
Downing Street says it has no evidence that the PM received a letter from the Conservative Party warning that an MP's conversations may have been bugged.

But anything that calls into question whether the letter was sent and implies it was never read - without actually saying so - will receive full marks.

Those who attempt the A Campbell gambit of attacking the letter writer and smearing them will receive half marks for effort.

No marks will be awarded for saying "Yeah we got that but as usual Gordon ignores everything Tories say, unless its a policy he needs to steal to stay in power."

Immoral Labour support illegal polygamy with your cash

Although perhaps nothing should surprise you for how Labour is willing to use your cash and destroy our culture and laws to buy votes and keep their useless career politicians in power this bit of caving in is surprising by its early arrival.

Labour is now paying benefits to multiple wives - i.e. state support for polygamy. Despite the fact its illegal !!!! ( Though Labour politicians do seem to think that the law only applies to other people these days.)

I hope those deluded people who call themselves Christian Socialists now realise the monster they are supporting.

MiaS predicted this would come a year ago- there is nothing - nothing - that Labour wouldn't defile, sacrifice or otherwise debase in our country for a few more grubby days in power.


Remember Jan last year:

Next in line for legalisation:

Polygamy : If you have no Christian basis for your laws then I just don't see how this can be refused. Also why shouldn't polygamous families not adopt also ? Only Christian families will be forbidden to adopt - in case the child they parent should 'want to be gay'. ( My Brother's family were given pushed back from fostering for just this reason. )

Christians in the Labour party need to ask themselves if they can in all conscience stay in a party that is so devoted to attacking their faith.

And of course as the cowards they are Labour ministers have sought to keep this quiet. They govern by spin, disinformation and special favours handing over centuries of traditions and laws for a few grubby votes.

You need Balls to fib like this ....

Ed Balls is reported as saying the following to a Labour party conference today ( reported by Pravda the faithful BBC ). Labour party members must be brain dead if they can swallow such direct contradictions of the facts of the last month - and indeed last 10 years.

He's beyond parody - here's what the faithful were expected to swallow:

"But for all the sound and fury of the past few weeks, it is still our party that has been setting the policy agenda - not taking the easy, short-term course, not just chasing headlines, but showing how a Labour government will meet the long-term challenges our country faces.

"And I believe that as a party and a government we have shown the strength to deal with difficult times and keep setting the agenda and responding to the concerns of the British people."

Also notice the mention of British - when we know most of the policies of the Brown government only apply to the English whom voted for another party at the last general election.

Lies - deception and spin. New Labour, MacLabour, Gordon Brown and its all Balls.

Labour move to destroy the evidence of their education failure

Ed Balls is moving to create so educationalist dream of a diploma (one no doubt when the educationalist can choose who succeeds and fails - the party faithful will at last be rewarded!).

I told you in passing that Labour would move to hide the evidence and just tell people things were working earlier. (See New Labour and Brezhnev post).

Why shouldn't there be some granularity to qualifications. The Diploma idea is a con to allow politically correct results to be published, not ones back by actual achievement and knowledge.

New Labour and Ed Balls are on the edge of criminal irresponsibility here.

New Labour and Brezhnev

Lenin, Stalin and Brezhnev were travelling on the Moscow underground when the train shuddered, creaked and stopped.

Lenin said - the driver must be re-educated to become a new man - then the train will move. So of he went to try - but the train stayed still.

Stalin said - the driver is a traitor to socialism and a counter revolutionary, he must be shot - and off Stalin went to shot the driver, but still the train didn't move.

Brezhnev said - I'll paint the windows of the train black - and tell people the train is moving !

Now before you laugh - remember New Labour is all about creating its own reality:

They don't spend on the NHS - they invest - mostly in salaries apparently,
Education, education, education ( yet we learn that primary and secondary schools are failing )
Standards at GCSE and A'Levels are always improving ( yet we now need an independent board as no one believes them any more ).
Devolution will quell nationalism ( but the Nats are now in government in at three devolved assemblies working towards the end of the UK ).
The Tories would cut the NHS - make up your own figure here - Gordon always does ( yet Gordon Brown cut £2Billion from the English NHS last year - but didn't make the corresponding Barnett formulae cuts to Wales and Scotland ).
The military can have whatever they want in Afghanistan ( except helicopters, ammunition, and yet there are no dedicated medivac helicopters, armoured vehicles are only just being purchased - troops have to pay council tax when out of the country - despite the small one of rebate - and are lucky to be able to vote - over 66% couldn't at the last general election ).
We have a vision for the future ( taken from watching the Conservative conference apparently)

New Labour has all been about perceptions - its great politics- its mostly lies - and its crap government.

When is a full term not a full term ?

Quentin Davis ( he of the sudden conversion to socialism ) has declared he was elected to serve a full term and won't be standing down for anything like a bye-election so that his conned constituents can decide if they want to have an MP who supports the interests of the Scottish Labour party.

So a full term means a full term in NuLabour speak, right ?

Only Tony Blair is being forced from office by a Brownite insurrection stepping down early - despite what he promised to the country, and letting the clunking fist in which he knows is unsuitable to run a Kirkcaldy Fish Supper shop - let alone the UK. He's also decided the people of Sedgefield are unworthy of his continued efforts to represent them now he has what he wants from them and is off to chase his legacy in the middle east.

So the real answer is NuLabour will do whatever is most convenient for themselves - personally. When they promise - they really deceive, and when they give oaths they lie. Its who they are.

---

PS Going to have to blog about the rest of today latter on - internet off - Blair may be running away, but I've got the annual school sports day and Father's race (aka annual mid life crisis race) to perform and I must get lots of work done this morning. If I'm alive by this evening then I'll be back for another chomp at the evils of socialism and its servants.