The evil of RedEd cycncism is breath taking

Freeze energy prices for 20 months. Its quite clear the stories about "never had a real job in his privileged socialist prince life" Miliband were on the mark.

Already the price of energy in the UK will be rising as energy companies start the hedge against a Labour victory. Damaging the people Ed Miliband cynically claims to want to help - but in truth they are useful victims of his desperate climb to power.

Already the deep damage of utter morons like Ed Miliband and his time doing damage as Secretary for State for Energy and the magic warmist cult - is making the recover slower and more risky. UK industry is hampered by high energy costs and people are hurt by high energy costs. Labour created this situation when they embraced the cynical green agenda.

There is only one word that cover Ed Miliband deep cynicism and willingness to inflict suffering on people to promote his own very deeply selfish career ambitions and that's evil.

PS Where Labour's commitment to remove VAT from fuel ?

The Left handle their reality problems by just lying about the past

There are a series of left wing politicians in the media busy trying to re-write history.

They range from the in-coalition ( just for now ) Nick Clegg who tries to mislead the public that the public sector was cut by the Conservatives in the 1980's ( when in fact public sector spending increased ). To Denis MacShameless MacShane (R4 Today before 8am ) who repeats the Labour lie of the moment that the public sector saved us from the banks problem - neglecting to mention the structural deficit that existed before then or that Labour financed its boom years by taxing an economy as it piled on debt, which they then had to transfer to the public sector.

We had Alistair Darling trying to get away with saying the crisis was caused by saving the world banks on Monday lunch time, but Martha Kearney wouldn't let him get away with it. He then tried to change to Labour smear No2 saying the Tories had agreed with everything before hand - neglecting the Labour lie used against the Conservtaives in 2005 about our plans to reduce the rate of increase in public spending meaning that every teacher doctor and nurse would get sacked.

We get the same sort of approach from that Trotskyite on Newsnight as he tries to convince those who don't know better that times are only bad during Conservative governments.

This is the key way Labour tries to deal with the damning report of history on its times in government - just lie and distort. The problem is that these smears and distortions aren't met by a rapid rebuttal at the point they are made.

This is in part facilitated by the BBC's change to not always having an opposing view in interviews which they introduced after their government came to power in 1997.

Whilst being in government is great - we need to make sure that Labour aren't allowed to lie their way out of their responsibility for the debt disaster they have left us with.

There must be a public enquiry into whether Labour allowed mass immigration for political purposes

I've just seen reports of this in the Daily Telegraph quoting Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

I have always suspected this has been Labour's policy and its in part why I hold them in such low regard that they are willing to sacrifice the interests of our country just for votes, spite and narrow political advantage.

This looks like the misuse of power and frankly I think criminal charges should result. ( Imagine the uproar from the left over Michael Howard doing anything like this ? Or you don't have to imagine think of the Shirley Porter and the sale of homes for votes scandal. That was just for a few votes - how about letting 2 million people in just for votes ! )

To start with their must be a public inquiry into immigration and the reason's for Labour allowing a flood of millions of people they said wasn't happening into our country.

On the other hand: It does occur to me that this might itself be a dirty trick by Labour to get the Conservatives making immigration noises so Labour can rerun the other great smear and lie they used in 2005 which had every interview with a Conservative spokesperson ( any spokeperson ) drowned out by questions on immigration. Is Mr Neather dropping his former bosses in it or has he been primed to kick this off ? This would fit the strange actions of Peter Hain and using the BNP to frighten people back into voting Labour. The only thing we know for sure is they are capable of anything and have no shame or honour and most certainly always put their political party before the country.

Are Labour using the BNP to scare its voters back ?

It occurs to me that there has been far too much protesting about Nick Griffin being on QT. Most of it from the left and their thugs in the various anti fascist organisations ( yes they're as anti democratic and worrying as the BNP is itself ).

Then we had Peter Hain making sure the subject occupied 2-3 days of prime media coverage this week.

Nick Griffin thinks they've all been idiots providing him free publicity, but I see a darker and more sinister explanation - one that the Labour have form for - of negative campaigning combined with trying to frighten and bully people into supporting them.

The Stop the BNP message works well for Labour with the ethnic groups they lost because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They can bribe the white working class nearer the election - if they can make it sound credible after so many years of broken promises.

I think Labour are actually finding an aspect of all this very useful indeed and may even have fanned the blames of this debate deliberately ( either that or Griffin is right about Hain et al ). Think about it, Labour the party of the media Grid letting a story build up due to actions of a senior figure of the party - I think thats unlikely to be chance.

Its the sort of deeply irresponsible party before country type of behaviour we have grown used to from Labour.

PS My guess is this will be one of the most watched Question Times ever - largely due to the actions of the Labour party and its anti-free speech allies.

As I've said elsewhere the panellists had better have done their home work because Nick Griffin is a slippery so and so and will be very hard to skewer. Those who think you can just turn out and say your a racist and win the argument are in for a shock.

The stakes are high tonight. Lets hope someone gets Nick Griffin below the water line.

Mandelson on the radio - trying another line

Labour just keep wheeling out on catch phrase routed in their deep seated dishonesty after another.

Being "wise spenders" is the latest - as Mandelson dances around avoiding the word cuts on radio4's today programme this morning.

He also tries to face down and bully bother Nick Robinson and the interviewer ( was it Eddie ? not sure ). Well even BBC staff have had enough of it - as you can see from Nick Robinson's blog here.

As to the new message ?

The clue is in the messenger.

Update: I think this just about says it all ...

Mandelson trying to spin the Rover report - typical Labour

He's the master of the dark arts. Just listening to him try and focus the Rover fiasco on disbaring the Alchemy managers as directors is a wonder to behold.

No mention of Labour part it the Rover down fall. No mention of the Chinese getting the better of Gordon Brown ( and therefore the long suffering English Taxpayer ). no mention of the pre election bribe using public money to keep Rover's collapse till after the 2005 election.

Same old evil Labour - but you have to admire the master as he practices his art.

The green shoots of spin start to get ready

So we have the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors ( who usually predict a rising property market - even just before the crash - I wonder why ? ) saying the housing market is off again ( their spokesperson almost certainly has their fingers crossed behind their back ) and the *government funded* National Institute for Economic and Social Research saying the recovery is coming. ( The Guardian and BBC are lapping this stuff up of course ).

Mean while the Bank of England hits the panic button again for another £50billion of government spending - sorry Quantitative easing due to the their view that UK recession "appears to have been deeper than previously thought".

The Bank of England is not independent - its board have been appointed under Labour.

What Labour want is a recovery to hold a general election in - whatever the disastrous consequences of doing so.

There is now a very large pile of cash being held on deposit at the Bank of England by the banks.

All the BoE needs to do to trigger its rapid dispersal into the economy is to start charging for the service of looking after it.

That would create a temporary blip in the economy just at the time of an election.

The Con could be on.

Further: Jeff Randal seems to get it.

This Labour government is now dangerously low on credibility, just when it most needs to be believed

Once when your prime minister told you something, especially when backed by figures or statements from our impartial civil and public services you'd believe him/her.

Those days we're doomed to end from May 1997 onwards.

New Labour - the party that won power through the dark arts of media manipulation, stories, media grids and its smear campaign ( remember sleaze ).

Labour held power though daring people to call them liars ( remember "I'm a pretty straight sort of guy" ) and meaningless, but focus group tested, catch phrases such as "education,education, education".

Then when that was no longer enough they bullied and coerced ( please note their first reaction is still to trash the reputation of the person saying something inconvenient rather than answer the point as is evidenced here ). They placed their people in as Speaker, head of the BBC, Chief constable of the Met etc etc.

But then that wasn't enough to hold back reality - so they started lying more openly. The most notorious being the WMD claims made by Blair with one particular press officers help at No 10. Blair hid behind the security services. He produced dossiers and told us in hushed terms that it was the best work of the security services, some internally tried to warn him and then the media - but one of their number has now died under suspicious circumstances. The man who organised the smear campaign against John Major's government could not stand supporting going to war on this basis. He resigned, and then not long afterwards died whilst walking on MOD land.

Labour's credibility at this point is requiring some very robust action. So they bullied the BBC and launched a witch hunt followed by the Hutton White wash ( so good that Alistair Campbell and Cherie Blair signed copies at Labour fund raisers ).

Labour promised that Helmand province would just be a policing operation. The coffins filled with our son's and daughters tell a different story.

Labour said Military commanders had what they needed and had asked for. They lied.

Labour down graded the ministry of defence by giving it a part time minister, then 4 others in short order. The current incumbent is ranked 21 out of 23 in the Cabinet.

Labour - and its disgraced leader Gordon Brown - said that helicopter numbers for the troops has increased to mislead the public into thinking that provision had improved when in reality troops had increased in the same proportion.

About a year and a half ago Gordon Brown told us how our economy was best placed in Europe for the coming "downturn" ( as the ever helpful to Labour BBC re-badged the recession ). That turned out to be rubbish. Indeed much of our problems were caused by Brown with his economy fueled by debt.

Education is now an embarrassing word for Labour - they have even abolished the word from ministerial titles as they only spend capital money on further ed colleges in their constituencies.

A few months ago Brown told us all how the UK amongst the best prepared in the world for a Flu pandemic.

Then the truth emerged that the NHS had no where near enough face masks ( countered with spin and lies about their effectiveness - you don't need them anyway we were told ) before ordering another massive batch for the NHS.

The government failed to react to the returning people from Mexico. Hence our outbreak is a few months ahead of most of the rest of the world ( we only lag behind Mexico and the US - where Quarantine really isn't an option ). Those few months may cost dearly as the wait for the first vaccine for the most vulnerable.

But we are told the NHS is ready - just unable to cope. ( Hidden away from public view ethics committees will be drawing up the rules of who dies and who lives by rationing access to the totally inadequate supply of ventilators for the most serious cases. ).

NHS Direct can't cope, GPs can't cope. No one knows who's getting Tamiflu and who isn't - though anyone who pops up on the radio gets shouted down by this government and its henchmen.

Now we are told deaths could range from 15k to 65 k most likely ( with the doomsday 750k still not ruled out ).

But do they have the credibility needed any more to carry this off ?

What is of course missing from the reassuring statements about seasonal flu killing so many each year is that this time it won't be Granny and Grandpa ( who have immune systems that can fight this flu ) but young Jimmy, Jane and Mum and Dad.

Even if the total deaths were the same as seasonal flu - they would be far more visible and impact a very different section of the population.

The government says today - Don't Panic. ( And its a responsible message at this time ).

But their history of lies, deceit, misdirection and spin make them very unlikely to be believed, and panic is a very real possibility ( and direct consequence of the lies, spin and deception that have been listen above and come from the dark heart of the New Labour project ).

How long before you hear of scuffles and unrest at Hospital A&E units ? Who is going to believe what they say as they try to calm worried parents and anxious families down ?

We have to trust to God and luck - because its all too clear the Labour government is not trust worthy or trusted by anyone.

[ This is of course why any patriotic Labour MP should vote for country not party and end this government. But they won't as many of them are second rate or morally compromised who put their life careers in politics with its offer of gold plated expenses and pensions way above the good of their fellow man. ]

On Andy Coulson

I'm just wondering who's media grid launching the political smear attack on Andy Coulson via the Guardian is on.

We know Labour have dirty tricks units setting up, and this sort of smear and innuendo stuff is just the sort of operation they have run in the past.

I have no idea of Mr Coulson's involvement in doing the electronic equivalent of going through peoples bins by tabloid journalists. However it now turns out that the Guardian had no new evidence and the police see nothing to make any further investigations about.

Right now this looks like muck racking from Labour.

Its going to be a dirty nasty campaign to eject the unelected Scottish socialist destroyer of our economy from office and all his nasty but expensive hangers on.

PS What are the odds on the Prince of Darkness being involved in this one ? It has his style.

Of course maybe Brown doesn't have to cut spending ...

Everyone seems to assume that the only way to resolve the public sector finance disaster is to cut spending ( except Gordon Brown & co of course ).

But hold on a minute folks - Brown could keep spending going and no cause a financial collapse as lenders refuse to fund him if ....

..if Brown raises TAXES.

Why is no one thinking of this ?

My guess is self censorship - everyone assume that no one would be suicidally stupid enough to raise taxes yet further when the productive part of the economy was already on it knees.

But I'm not so sure.

Socialism benefits from misery and destitution - and this plan would create much more of both. You can see why Labour might favour it..

Don't say I didn't warn you.

Labour's plans are Evil and are intend to take us all for fools

I just heard Lord Mandelson's broadcast on R4's Today this morning ( because it was more of a broadcast than an interview - despite the PoD complaining about Evan Davis trying to get him to focus on the question - Labour have never done this since New Labour started it, part of their plan for deceit and undermining democracy through lies and spin. They are now clearly the Evil party ).

Mandelson issued the new view of reality which explains why you shouldn't have the normal spending review before the general election in case it provides information to the electorate about what you are really going to do ( making the lies, smear, deceits and scheme's that his pupil Gordon Brown intends to rape our democracy with impossible to achieve - remember Labour are Evil .)

How do they intend to carry this off ?

By issuing a series of unfunded "rights", which will take longer than the period that the next general election must be held within to prove to be unfunded (evil).

By using economic activity and unemployment as an excuse after the general election for having to make the 7% across the board departmental cuts their own figures show to be needed. This allows them to deny their own figures till after the electorate has been conned to vote for them (evil).

By bearing false witness about other peoples plans. Specifically the Conservative who as a first pass have used the governments own figures from the budget ( something Labour seem unwilling to do ). ( evil and direct breach of one of the 10 commandments ).

But then when you make the unelected Prince of Darkness effectively Prime Minister to hold up the defeated and unelected winner of the gutless coup what do you expect?

There will be some Labour party members who would support Labour if they made Pol Pot their leader, but there must still be some with a conscience and at least some decency who will put country before the careers of the demons in charge of Labour right now. There time to act is now.

PS I should add at one point in his R4 party political broadcast, because that's what interviews with Labour demons ministers now are, he accused the Conservatives of entering into a Faustian pact. Nice to see the PoD has a sense of humour ...., or was its a Freudian slip ?

Update: It seems a Treasury spokeswoman ( was refered to in BBC radio and online reports this lunch time see here ) has refused to confirm that the spending review which everyone believes will force cuts on any government will be delayed beyond the general election. Was Mandelson speaking without authority or is either Darling or Brown getting cold feet about the whole "lie to the electorate" thing ?

Is Ed Balls telling a Brownie about the money he's cutting from the Education budget ?

At about lunch time I wondered, on hearing radio 4 explain how Capita had a contract to enforce run the National Literacy and Numeracy scheme if saving money might also be a motive for Labour.

But then I heard Ed Balls being interviewed and my memory of that interview was he promised to pass the money ( which would be "ring fenced" on to schools to do the same job ).

Now I'm not quite sure what teachers need to spend the money on, but the Daily Mail tells this story as the government saving £100 million on spending on consultants.

Could Ed Balls be telling us a Brownie ?

The signs will be other government projects that involve consultants being cancelled as the money runs out. The Government has approved just 13 of 144 frozen further education projects – and every one in a Labour seat. The rest are swinging in the wind.

The money is running out, but being the shameless Labour party with the moral courage of sewer rats they may be dressing up what they have to do as a great initiative. Of course the Unions will love it - maybe they'll even help the Labour party out with its funding problems ?

This one needs watching closely - they have past form on this.

PS Also note that they rubbed Speaker Bercow's nose in the dirt by announcing to the media ( as they always have - only the shameless Labour party has done this - it has nothing to do with "the News cycle made me do it" excuse dished up by the back after scandal Peter Hain last week. Same old disgusting Labour types ruining our country as usual ).

Referendums combined with general elections are a dirty trick and should be banned

There have now been two suggested referendums to be combined with the next general election.

In both case ( electoral reform and Scottish independence ) its not the referendum question that's the motivation, but a desire to hold up the Labour vote.

It shows you the lengths that Labour will toy with to hang onto power.

The answer should be that no referendum is necessary with parties seeking election on manifesto's ( which could themselves include plans for subsequent referendums ).

The Conservatives should refuse to be bound by any such results and bring in laws to outlaw such cheap tactics in future elections.

"Poor Gordon Brown - lets feel sorry for him" - new Labour deceit plan

The smoke and spin coming out of Number 10 has just increased dramatically. Someone else is trying to pull the wool over the electorates eyes and help destroy the country by continuing the most disastrous premiership since Neville Chamberlain for a few more despicable and staggeringly expensive days.

Simon Lewis is to try to extent the country's suffering using his skills.

Its like a horror move where the monster is never dead. You think you've woken up and its all over, but then articles start appearing in papers to reposition Brown ( even Cherie Blair chipping in - what can have motivated her to do that ? ;-) ).

Brown claims he could walk away and become a teacher ( yeah right ). We have Roy Hattersley on the radio this morning complaining about prime minster's questions ( a form of debate that Labour manipulated in 97 to make it more favourable to their man ). We have the setting Brown up as the underdog strategy.

And all the while the country sinks further and further at an ever accelerating rate weighed down by Gordon Brown's millstone of debt just so selfish PR people can try for a triumph over the electorate.

Still Peter Mandelson achieves his mission of keeping out the Conservatives till Lisbon is ratified by the bullied Irish.

The hypocrisy of Hazel Blears

I'm fed up of Labour careerists who wound but fear to strike. The likes of Blears who want to win votes by feeling the voters pain and being seen to be on their side ( which today means against Gordon Brown ), but to do so whilst still in the cabinet.

Its the same trick when cabinet minister, um like Hazel Blears, campaigned against the health cuts their own constituencies that their collective responsibility government was inflicted on England ( but never Scotland and Wales ).

I know many of them will never earn much once they are not ministers (expense fiddling aside) and they are immersed in the shameless gutless culture of the Labour party that treats the poor, down on their luck and dependant the same was a drug pusher treats their clients, but surely even they realise they should act honourably ?

During Conservative governments these things were understood, but I guess Conservative ministers were generally talented enough to live productive lives away from government.

Blears should either resign from the cabinet ( and if she is really interested int he people's welfare then the corrupt parasite that is the Labour party as well ) to make her case, or do what she is signed up for of trying to explain how Labour has sold us all and our children into debt slavery in exchange for little improvement in services - which will now have to be cut either by the IMF or the Conservatives.

In short she's a hypocrite, and member of the most dishonourable, incompetent, gutless, shameless and useless government this country has ever had the misfortune to have to tolerate.

Update: I see she's being forced to come out a swear allegiance to Big Brother - how very Labour. As Matthew Parris has said - the problem with Labour's Cabinet is they are gutless.

Mandelson is at the root of Liebour's evil

The Prince of Darkness ( aka Peter Mandelson - forced to resign twice from the Cabinet - sent of to Europe on a very high paid job and back for a third snout in the trough experience with Gordon Brown ) is trying the old Jedi mind trick on the media (aka spin).

He's announcing that the scandal over Labour's dirty tricks campaign run by Gordon Brown long term associates is over. And of course using standard Labour spin deceit techniques he tries to re-write history - most of which is hardly a week old. Get a load of this for pure evil and deception:

Lord Mandelson said ..... the prime minister had acted "so decisively and quickly in getting rid of him".

This is demonstrably not the case (Brown dithered and apparenetly accepted his old friends resignation only when the pressure was unbearable - when sacking for misconduct was surely required - I wonder if he keeps his gold plated public sector taxpayer funded pension as a result ? ) - but that doesn't stop Mandelson for one minute.

It will be interesting to see how all the MSM commentators who have been rushing out Damian McBride stories react to one of the Liebour Undead who hasn't yet been dispatched by Guido Von Hesling.

Remember the lies, spin deception all came in with the New Labour project and who was at its heart?

Of course the ever faithful BBC runs the story with the prominence that you would expect from the prince's favoured familiar, but unlike the old days on post 97 other views make it into the report - although way down in the article.

Update: Maybe this is the news story Lord Mandelmort is trying to bury with the above absurd statement ?

Despite all the spin and chaff being fired by Labour spin doctors the question of how the email really got out is still open. Since the effect of the email leak has been to strip Brown of man of the thugs who protected his position an internal Labour party source can't be ruled out.

Further: Seems I'm not the only one to wonder if the leaked emails aren't really a smoking gun re-starting the Blairite/Brown civil war.

The use of taxpayer money for "campaigning"

The following advert has been appearing at taxpayer expense ( ie you paid for it ) in the most popular newspapers in very prominent positions.

Just like the "Real Help Now" slogan, that taxpayers have to fund and Labour politicians use.

PS Does anyone think Justice Seen, Justice Done is a fair description of the Home Office after 10 years of Labour ? ( And anyway isn't there a department of Justice now ? )

Dangerous dogs and Gordon Brown's culpability

Just what is it with Gordon Brown and apologies ?

All he has to say is he's sorry and regrets any distress that those he selected to work for him have caused distress and offence. That's the decent thing to do, it would even improve the general public's image of him ( though not mine as I'm now beyond reconciliation with the idea that Gordon Brown is a decent honest man ).

We have Alan Johnson on the media right now with the spin de jour that ""Gordon Brown had nothing to do with this. You apologise for the things you are responsible for," see the BBC here.

Right oh Alan, lets see if I can lay this out for you:

Brown is closely, very closely, associated with McBride. He came over from the Treasury and is widely seen as an attack dog - his transfer with Brown after the coup against the elected prime minister shows he's Brown's attack dog. Brown knew what sort of man he is. (We can't tell if Browns intense interest in anti-Tory tactics had him discussing these things with McBride and Draper - who has been invited to chequers to discuss Labour's failure to control the Internet ).

If you own a dangerous dog and don't control it then you are responsible for what happens. The dog bites and savages because its in his nature - the owner is responsible.

The same goes for attack dogs.

You would have thought an ex-postman would understand that.

PS I assume the likable Mr Johnson was wheeled out today as one of the last Labour minister not universally despised in the country. He's wasting his good name on this issue.

Update: It is always worth paying attnetion to the precise meaning of words used by Labour spin doctors and their number ten tax payer funded colleagues. The Guardian reports number ten saying "Neither the prime minister, nor anybody else in Downing Street, had knowledge of these emails.".

That does not equate with a denial of knowledge or even instigation of a plan to smear senior and popular Conservatives.

Number 10 needs to make itself available for a series of questions with truthful answers ( not Gordon Browns standard issue evasions from his PMQ tractor production stats performances ) about this affair, as well as delivering a full apology.

Developing: Brown has now almost contradicted Alan Johnson, but deploying the following ploys:
1) Writing to Sir Gus O'Donnel and demanding standards are raised ( they do this every time ).
2) Saying he's written to those who were the targets of the smears (does this amount to an apology ?)
3) Claiming no ministers were involved, including the one who sits next to Damian McBride and has previous for nasty videos which made suggestion about what David Cameron would do to be popular that I'm not going to repeat here - but they were shameful . ( Has Brown asked each one individually ? Has he received assurances ? Are any of them more honest than the ones his mate Derek Drapper has given in the past ? Why should anyone believe this statement ? Will Brown resign if it turns out not to be the case ? )

As I said before pay careful attention to any weasel words you hear. They will try to imply denials with words they know will be misunderstood or construed to say something else than they actually do.

Lets remember Brown is now being forced to do what he's doing by the bad publicity and advice of political advisers. Its not the instinctive reaction of a decent man - the time for such reactions was a few days ago.

PS Expect the Labour spin machine to try and turn this one around and widen its scope to lose the focus that's giving them so much trouble. They could even try to make Tom Harris' April fools joke look like prophecy in time.....

On the positive side a number of Labour bloggers have clearly shown their disgust with these events. See Mike Ion for an example, Tom Harris or Alex Hilton. As I said earlier I'm afraid I can't share their belief in the underlying morality and decency of their leader, but the greater good will be served by the actions they suggest - even if they are forced from Brown.

Turns out - the "hand written letter of regret" that allowed Brown to spin last nights news was just a statement of regret about the damage done to politics - see Iain Dale's report here. They are beyond even the simplest decency and honesty. Are they trying to apologise, bcause it looks like they are just trying to spin their way out.

PS Beeboids - don't think we didn't notice your attempt to muddy the waters by using Michael Heselltine last night, inviting the follow on about the "New Labour, New Danger" campaign.

See also today's Telegraph view here "Gordon Brown can't pretend he did not know about the Damian McBride scandal"

What wouldn't Brown do to stay in office ?

Because I'm beginning to wonder. Just consider some of the evidence:

1. Sell out our ability to control our own banking system ( he's been volunteering that if only the EU will give him good publicity at his G20 election rally ).
2. Sell out his country to the EU ( Tick - done when signing the Lisbon treaty ).
3. Enslave the whole population to more debt than was run up fighting the Nazis (Tick - Pretend help now - Real pain later. )
4. Refuse to reform public services in case it damages his plans to become prime minister and allows him to annoy Tony Blair (Tick - the NHS now kills people by the plane load at some hospitals ).
5. Send our forces to fight, but refuse to provide them with the equipment to do the job - but just lie about it hoping people won't notice (Tick ).
6. Destroy the English Constitution to try and get back some Catholic votes lost when the organised murder of unborn children and experimentation on human embryos and creation of Frankenstein hybrids was authorised, along with outlawing Christian morality on human relations and treating Christian couple who want to adopt/foster as criminals (Just working on it with the palace as we speak on the first part - Tick everywhere else).
7. Fund Islamic extremism with public money (apparently to stop Terrorism !!) and completely fail to enforce the law on immigration leading to millions of people who are now starting to form colonies in the country rather than integrate (Tick - as long as they vote Labour he doesn't care about the future ).
   

The costs of Gordon Brown's mistakes from the pre-election bride at Rover, through selling gold at the low in the market and the pathetic minor (but expensive ) adjustment to VAT and the billion upon billions spent on Scottish banks to be paid for by English people and their children and their children.

As I've said elsewhere the mood on Labour and Brown is turning ugly. If I was a Labour MP I would go out in disguise on the streets for the shame of being associated with Gordon Brown and the pathetic party that puts its own expense accounts ahead of the good of the country.

The double standards of our politicians

Here we go again. This time is Tony McNulty. Can you believe it ?

He's an effective defender of the indefensible on TV and radio, one of Labour's last stonewallers. He certainly tries to give an impression of being a man of the people.

So surely he knew that the £60k for a second home a few miles from his first was wrong ? Wasn't the allowance to allow parents to stay close to Parliament ?

Its been said many times before, but what strikes me is that if any one of us Non-MPs/Political class did this we would be looking at an appearance in county court and even prison.

If Mr McNulty had any sense of shame he would stand down as a MP.

But he won't because the gravy wagon is just too good to get off.

Soon he'll be back on our radios defending the Labour government and trying to sound like a man of the people again. He'll know the button to push, the focus group tested phrases to deploy and fake anger and plain rudeness to use against his opponents. but remember he's Mr £60k - your £60k which you would go to prison if you didn't offer up as a tribute to New Labour.