Showing posts with label Anti-English Labour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anti-English Labour. Show all posts

Friday, October 23, 2015

Labour created two classes of MP

So EVEL has passed, I give it a guarded welcome as a milestone on the route to an English Parliament and devolved government.

But just let me answer Labour's pathetic and anglophobic whining - there have been two classes of MP ever since devolution to Scotland and Wales. It is just double speak to try to claim its happening now.

Yes EVEL's a dogs breakfast, but that's how the current political elite treat England.

I look forward to the day England is offered equality of respect to Scotland and Wales, but EVEL is a start. Labour should stop compalining about the process they started and forced on the UK.

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Labour see devolution just as an anti-Tory measure

Ed Miliband was busy trying to cheer up the Welsh Labour party - you know the one in government and responsible for the dire failure of the Welsh NHS and Education systems - with promises of more capability to damage destroy,  ruin and in now many cases prematurely end peoples lives with the curse of socialism.

Why ?

Because they are still pursuing the Brown model of devolution as a way to keep Labour in power for ever and have the English pay for it.

Labour want to destroy the Union yet further with their anti-English devolution fix up.

No parliament for England, no government for England because Labour worry they won;'t be able to damage peoples lives by being in government all the time and enriching themselves and their offspring.

I@m not sure why Labour is bothering to argue for the Union in Scotland as it has a clear hatred of the English and their views. Indeed about the only thing Labour likes about England is our money.

Friday, June 18, 2010

Note on the 80's for leftie revisionsts

Getting a bit fed up of the selective historical memories of the left over the 80's.

What they never accept is:

1) After the last Labour Govt in 79 the UK was a basket case.
2) Much of the left and the Unions were devoted to destroying what was still working.
3) Margaret Thatcher saved the country from ruin, the Soviet Union, the unions, aggressive Argentine fascist dictators and grabbed a large amount of our cash back from the EEC EC EU.

On 3) yes eggs got broken - but they had to be. The sort of insane industrial policy that Labour seem to have just discovered again just lead to wealth being destroyed and Britain falling yet further behind the rest of the world. The case for this was so obvious that by 1997 even Labour accepted that much of what Mrs T did was right, and made no attempt to reverse it.

There was no alternative.

And you Guardian reading, BBC supporting tax wasting leftie Luddites - TINA's back !

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

But what about the serving ministers ?

Labour damage control has swung into full action this morning. The ever helpful BBC has cooked up another scandal, which they probably had in their back pocket, which implicates MPs of all parties to help spread the heat.

Gordon Brown has taken the cowardly, yet for him completely predictable route, of ruling out an inquiry before he's even seen the evidence - or made any inquiries himself. ( This in itself is a massive scandal and shows all those Labour supporters who back Brown that they are linked with his amoral and disgusting sacrifice of the whole country for his narrow self interests and emotional needs. )

All this implies their is fire behind the smoke.

And the fire could be this;

Remember all these phone calls Byers and co made had people at the other end of them. Those people are serving Labour cabinet ministers.

The like of Mandelson are now developing selective amnesia - "I have no recollection of ..." - which is the classic way of denying the truth these days.

There are specific allegations here - times and place with defined outcomes.

This is the basis of an investigation - even the left wing BBC must see that.

But of course Labour and the BBC know they only have to last 24 ore hours before they bury the bodies under Gordon Browns last insult to the nation of his false a deceitful budget.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

What if - there is no recovery ?

Labour have pinned their hopes on the Tooth Fairy - encouraged by Prof Blanchflower et al.

But what if there's no recovery ?

The pound was competitively devalued over 6 months ago - yet our balance of payments gets worse.

We've had £200billion of printed money to pay Gordon Brown's debt for a few more months "stimulus", yet almost none of it went to private enterprise ( as the govt and BoE spun the initial plan to start Mugabenomics ).

VAT cuts and car scrappage schemes boast other countries economies ( as we import so much ) at the expense of our debt.

In this case Labour's ( & lets not forget those ultimate hedge betters the Lib Dems ) have made the most disastrous mistake possible. They have loaded vastly more debt which we must pay interest on and repay - mostly to let the value of that money leak overseas due to the UK's continued bloated non productive sector sucking in imports - and all this just for the career of one very selfish man - Gordon Brown.

Labour have gambled with all our futures and taken unforgivable risks.

This risk could have very real consequences - for example the shortages of life saving drugs as pharmacists export them to higher exchange rate areas, and that's just the beginning.

Its all been one massive gamble for a few more votes for a few dishonest politicians who want to carry on destroying the country for a few more years.

There is just no excuse for voting Labour. They are selfish, reckless and just plain wrong - and some of them who know this are evil for putting their party before country.

Tuesday, February 02, 2010

Equality and repression

The Pope has entered the debate on Labour's plans for a secular legally enforced religion with prosecution and imprisonment for those who commit heresy against the wisdom of Labour/ the BBC/ the Guardian. ( This is spun, just as blatantly, by the militant secularists who will tolerate no dissent on Equality legislation. )

I'm afraid from a UK point of you he's a bit late - before the vote in the house of Lords would have been better- but better late than never.

But will the Catholic Church recommend anyone-but-Labour for the general election ? Given Labour's enthusiasm for murdering unborn children who are viable human beings you would have thought that this line would already have been crossed.

Sadly as an Anglican, the Church of England's Bishops are almost invisible on this issue of the freedom of religion.

Anyway, a few corrections from what I've heard on the radio this morning.

The Church isn't worried about employing gays or anyone else. It is worried about appointing people who openly proclaim its teachings are wrong to positions of pastoral or doctrinal authority or whom represent the church. The Church better than many other knows that all have sinned and carry on doing so - its those who say this state doesn't matter or exist that worries it.

Now there are those who argue that the current Equality legislation doesn't force this. I heard a member of the hard line British Humanist association talking about just janitors etc. However, since he has no basis for being honest and fears no judgement I go with the advice of of Christian lawyers who warn it does.

What's happening here is the establishment of an arbitrary humanist morality backed by the terror of the state. Its the opposite of what those who have an open mind or a faith should want to see.

Arguments will be made in terms of rights of services etc but some of those people making those arguments have other agendas.

The bottom line is that any Christian or Muslim should think very long and hard before voting Labour.

Labour has become a rabidly anti-Christian organisation whose actions lead to the repression of Christians and needs to be recognised as such.

Saturday, January 09, 2010

Greece shows us one potential future tragedy for the UK

The Greek Socialist party won their recent general election on a set of blind refusals to accept reality that look a lot like Gordon Brown's refusal to own up to the staggering debt crisis he's created.

Their chickens are now coming home to roost very quickly indeed.

There is an ongoing debate in the UK about spending plans not adding up. Labour tried to claim Conservative plans don't add up - by making them up from Labour figures and with highly questionable use of civil servants time. Its of course laughable to take a lecture on this from Labour, but they know that - they are just trying to create a sense of general despair out of fear uncertainty and doubt.

Until the snow coup this week Labour were again in denial about the need to cut the public sector budget to reduce the deficit ( they are not even targeting reducing debt due to an economists trick of expecting GDP to grow so that whilst debt may expand or stay stationary as a proportion of GDP ).

Now Alistair Darling seems to have won the concession, extracted from Gordon Brown over the barrel of this weeks events, but he's sticking into the carry on digging till the debt hole till after the election strategy.

My guess is that Labour are now going to have to go long for the general election, and the risk of a currency/gilts crisis is now very real - and Darling knows he has to signal to the markets that Labour are lying to the electorate just to win votes (at least that line's credible), but will pay back the creditors when returned to power.

So perhaps Labour, as they are now reconfigured , may make some vague future promises in the budget they still claim to want to stage. But a few weeks before a general election it will be a purely political affair that makes the PBR look like an exercise is selfless statesmanship.

But still the bills must either be paid, or no more money will be leant. The UK is now reduced to its ability to borrow more money to put of facing up to the structural deficit Labour has run for almost a decade.

I imagine their will be riots and violence in Greece, and wouldn't rule out the same thing here.

Sunday, January 03, 2010

Labour's Equality agenda is about anything but ...

I don't know about you but I first started hearing the term the ***** (insert term) agenda from Sinn Fein, probably in the 80's. It was a Marxist way of putting some sort of objective in vague form that justified all sorts of unreasonable ideas to achieve it.

Well now we have Harriet Harman's Equality Agenda.

But she doesn't mean what you think she means. by equality Labour don't mean equality of each of her Majesty's subjects before the law, they mean the excuse to subvert that very thing.

Examples are starting to pile up and they include:

  • Making motorists pay fines for crimes they haven't committed ( the new victims leavy on crimes without victims - ie a stealth tax ).
  • Providing grants to some students but expecting the parents of other to pay for their own offspring and those of other - even though the whole point of tertiary education is supposed to be about the future benefits to the individual concerned.
  • Putting Equality issues on a par with Education in schools ( making it quite clear that Labour doesn't see schools as being there for education but for indoctrination ).
  • Turning the police from a force to fight crime, into a service that will knock at your door to accuse you of hate crimes, take your DNA and attack you for not being diverse enough.
There will be more, much more. Labour believe the state should be a thug bullying its cowered citizens into saying the right things and being afraid of denying its mantras.

Labour are the sworn enemy of aspiration, freedom and justice.

And they intend to pursue their plans to destroy these things under the banner of Equality.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

We have grown used to the lies and nothing can shock us any more

I'm alarmed by the current Iraq inquiry.

Not because the emerging confirmation of what most of us believed to be true anyway - that the Iraq war was about regime claim and the WMD claims were false and that only the parlour game of denials etc from Blair and Labour prevented that getting in the open -but because I can hardly raise myself to condemn it.

NHS hospitals, rated "good", are killing their patients by the sort of neglect Florence Nightingale set out to correct. ( That that's before we get into the state sanctioned execution protocols for the elderly and weak - see Liverpool pathway. We are a society that recoils from the death penalty for the most heinous monsters, but is happy for Granny to be staved to death as long as it has the work protocol before it. )

How weary we have become of the lies, spin and deceit.

How little hope we have that anything will ever be done.

Does anyone think Blair and his cabinet (including Brown) will stand trial for Iraq ?

This is what Labour have reduced us to. A country that no longer expects honesty backed by the threat of justice or even the rule of its own laws.

A country where an unelected prime minister signs away our sovereignty without even asking us as he promised to do in the Labour manifesto.

Britain's again the sick man of Europe - and England is locked up in the cellar, and our malady has many different forms. But the cause has been the immorality of the Labour party.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

And so it begins

The RAF are poised to announce savage cuts shortly, in an attempt to pre-empt other cuts to follow.

The cuts they are probably aiming for may well help kill the Fleet Air Arms fast jet capability (by wiping out the Harrier squadrons), and also are a tacit acceptance that the UK will be unable to undertake any large offensive operations in the near future and perhaps also unable to defend itself for any period of time ( the cut in airborne early warning aircraft show this).

Inside government, below the level of ministerial denial and lies to the public things are clearly very desperate indeed.

This is just the beginning. What follows will be painful and humiliating and it is all the fault of Gordon Brown and his arrogance and wilful destruction of one of the worlds most successful countries and economies.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Are Labour using the BNP to scare its voters back ?

It occurs to me that there has been far too much protesting about Nick Griffin being on QT. Most of it from the left and their thugs in the various anti fascist organisations ( yes they're as anti democratic and worrying as the BNP is itself ).

Then we had Peter Hain making sure the subject occupied 2-3 days of prime media coverage this week.

Nick Griffin thinks they've all been idiots providing him free publicity, but I see a darker and more sinister explanation - one that the Labour have form for - of negative campaigning combined with trying to frighten and bully people into supporting them.

The Stop the BNP message works well for Labour with the ethnic groups they lost because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They can bribe the white working class nearer the election - if they can make it sound credible after so many years of broken promises.

I think Labour are actually finding an aspect of all this very useful indeed and may even have fanned the blames of this debate deliberately ( either that or Griffin is right about Hain et al ). Think about it, Labour the party of the media Grid letting a story build up due to actions of a senior figure of the party - I think thats unlikely to be chance.

Its the sort of deeply irresponsible party before country type of behaviour we have grown used to from Labour.

PS My guess is this will be one of the most watched Question Times ever - largely due to the actions of the Labour party and its anti-free speech allies.

As I've said elsewhere the panellists had better have done their home work because Nick Griffin is a slippery so and so and will be very hard to skewer. Those who think you can just turn out and say your a racist and win the argument are in for a shock.

The stakes are high tonight. Lets hope someone gets Nick Griffin below the water line.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Govt to sell £3billion of English assets to fund UK - but no Scots assets

You could raise a lot of money if you sold the future rights to tax North Sea oil for example.

But no the Scots lead government of the anti-English Labour party instead plans to:

1) Sell the right to Tax the English for a crossing they have already more than paid for at Dartford.
2) Sell the English student loan book ( maybe some Welsh and Irish in there somewhere ).
3) Sell the Channel Tunnel rail link - which will allow ,money to be raised from the English again

Why not sell the rights to future North Sea Oil and Gas revenues ? That would be simple and there would be plenty of buyers, but of course the unelected Scottish prime minister and the Scottish MP who is Chancellor of the exchequer prefer to sell the English into further debt for the state spending in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland that the English fund and Labour won't cut back.