Showing posts with label English Parliament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label English Parliament. Show all posts

Friday, October 23, 2015

Labour created two classes of MP

So EVEL has passed, I give it a guarded welcome as a milestone on the route to an English Parliament and devolved government.

But just let me answer Labour's pathetic and anglophobic whining - there have been two classes of MP ever since devolution to Scotland and Wales. It is just double speak to try to claim its happening now.

Yes EVEL's a dogs breakfast, but that's how the current political elite treat England.

I look forward to the day England is offered equality of respect to Scotland and Wales, but EVEL is a start. Labour should stop compalining about the process they started and forced on the UK.

Friday, April 24, 2015

So the Conservatives are Scottish (&Welsh) Nationalists but not English Nationalists right ?

Cameron is getting desperate. As evidence you should see the hastily cobbled together English Manifesto launched today.

In short its just an attempt to fool UKIP voters into thinking that #CastIronDave can be trusted, despite all the betrayals of the last 5 years.

But there is also the hypocrisy of the Conservative position. As the James Kirkup in the Daily Telegraph says "David Cameron is today adamant that the Tories are not English nationalists and will never back an English parliament."

Right - but the Conservatives do back the Scottish and soon to be renamed Welsh Parliaments ....

So by the same logic they must be Scottish Nationalists ( don't tell the SNP ).

So in trying to appeal to English voters the Conservatives have yet again insulted our country and our patriotic identity.

I guess we should be grateful that some ground has been ceded - but the depth of the hypocrisy is just staggering.

In truth this is David Cameron's Emily Thornberry English flag tweet moment - only the conspiracy against England amongst the fourth estate will prevent the damage.

Just remember this is yet another example of who and what Cameron and those who support him in the Conservative leadership really are.

They can never be trusted again.

Thursday, November 07, 2013

English ship yards and regiments wouldn't be sacrificed so easily if ....

... there was an English Parliament and thus English politics.

As there isn't we get stuffed every time by the British political class.

Friday, October 05, 2012

The British establishment prepares to try to defraud England again

We learn from the Conservatives Scottish leader that Dave is planning a constitutional settlement for the whole UK.

The article talks of English regions, no doubt because they were briefed to do so.

So the British Establishment, in order to carry on governing England in areas like Health and Education that are English only responsibilities, is going to go for the balkanisation approach against England again.

Its simple and clear what the UK needs and its an English Parliament in a federal UK.

Some of us, whilst fond of the UK could live without it rather than accept the imposed British subjugation of what was once a free country.

The fight for England is about to start in earnest.


Thursday, February 09, 2012

Farage on support for an English parliament


               
   
               
   
               
   
               
   
               
   
           


Couldn't faulty him on this. Very encouraging.

Monday, January 09, 2012

Appeasement just makes the beast hungry

You'd think this message would have been burnt into the minds of our politicians.

Its one of the earliest lessons of English history. Paying the Danegeld just gets you more Danes with menaces back in a few years.

Sacrificing Czechoslovakia doesn't buy peace, it guarantees war.

For a while the democracies learnt this lesson and Lady Thatcher and President Regan faced down the evil empire of socialism and freed half of Europe.

But with Scottish separatism the lesson was forgotten.

The SNP aren't to blame here - though the swamp of Scottish nationalism has some unpleasant undercurrents, creatures, pools of Anglophobia and views in it.

It was Labour and the Lib Dems who thought playing with the Union would let them get back at Thatcher. So for narrow partisan advantage they played up to the separatism and broke the Union with the rabidly anti-English devolution betrayal of the Union. ( Yes it was Labour that brought this to pass - but the Lib Dems where key partners in crime here ). They thought they could rule Scotland for ever and that appeasing the nationalist beast would stop it in its tracks.

How misguided they were. ( Though lets face it since Labour has been wrong about almost every major decision in politics its not a surprise ).

Now a SNP Scottish Executive ( which the government lacks the guts to call it its legal name ) plays up on grievances, and plans an emotional referendum and Westminster has suddenly realised perhaps they could lose it. ( Though of course no one is offering Scotland independence, but really Greek style rule from Brussels ).

Appeasement has been a disaster - again.

But also the mold of the UK has been broken. As I have said on other forums before only a federal UK can be stable and that requires an English Parliament that contains an English Executive.

Nothing else can prevent the inevitable break up of the UK under the unjust partisan botched job that Labour created when they started the break up of the Union with devolution.

Though perhaps the break up of the UK and its hated citizens with their conservative values was Labour and Lib Dems idea all along, to deliver the home nations in bite sized chunks to the EU.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Frank Field on the EU debate and England last night

Its hard to argue with a word here ...

Monday, July 11, 2011

Only an English Parliament and English Government can save the Union

Last week I was at a Conservative political meeting and made the point of just how far English political opinion has moved against the Union being preserved.

It seems that one more round of appeasement may be being planned to solve the problem. Full autonomy for the Scottish government ( a sort of dominion I guess ).

Lets be clear - this will result in just one thing - Scottish independence in a generation, with England left paying for the Welsh and Irish.

There are only two ways to preserve the Union.

  1. Reverse Labour's anti-English devolution settlement.
  2. Set up an equivalent English parliament and government, with a Union government handling some macro economic issues, defence and foreign policy.
Anything less will mean the end of the Union. Its time for David Cameron to wake up and grasp this. We need to be lead to a new stable constitutional settlement that is just for everyone, or else the Union will just become history.

Friday, December 10, 2010

English Education policy

Yesterday showed something else, apart from the entirely predictable left wing thuggery on the streets, and that is the need for an English Parliament.

We have an issue that only impacts the English - tuition fees - being voted on by the likes of Charles Kennedy and Ming Campbell.

Time for an English Parliament and the Celtic fringe can go and play in Cardiff, Belfast & Edinburgh.

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Time to turn devolution into federalism

So for St Andrew's day we have the announcement of some more financial powers for the Scottish devolved executive and its regional council parliament.

But surely logic demands that the devolved governments should have responsibility for raising all the cash they spend, otherwise devolution will continue as a parasitic exercise bleeding the English dry.

There will be some debate as the SNP is really pursuing its goal of turning Scotland into a PIGS basket case and will never stop asking for more powers until there are none left or given away to Brussels. And of course as we are finding out yet again the English tax payer still has to fund out the Celtic fringe even when its been granted independence ( see our second bailout of the southern Irish state ).

Better that this is all done on a formal and equal basis, and overseen by the grown ups who will end up paying anyway ( ie the English ).

So how about a federal UK with division of powers and financial responsibilities clearly and fairly laid out. That means an English Parliament and an English government. But then we almost have those right now - its just no one dares say so.

A bit of honesty, clear thinking, and straight talking is needed.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

An independent line

It certainly felt good to see David and Sam Cameron enter Downing street. I'm a Conservative party member who campaigned for a Conservative government, and whilst this isn't precisely what I campaigned for it contains many of the key elements.


During the campaign I've mostly targeted my comments at other parties and avoided any issues I might have with my own, except for the English Question.

Well here comes the but - normal service will be resumed shortly.

I'm still a Conservative, but I'm not a slavish follower and we're not under election conditions so I'll be speaking my mind here.

I'm economically liberal, but socially conservative. I'm patriotic but pragmatic. I willing to give the benefit of the doubt but not to be taken for a ride. Lets see how the coalition works out, I won't hold back from criticism where I think its warranted.

Two major areas of disagreement I expect to have with the new government are on;

    1) An English Parliament - its very clear we should have one. I also think this would make our country stable again and save the Union. A lot of Unionist seem to oppose giving the English their national recognition, but they are making a fatal mistake.
    2) The Climate Change Fallacy - Sorry guys I am very far from being convinced that the Warmest argument is true, indeed the majority of reliable evidence (known as the geological record) points the other way.


These are the two main points but there will be others.

We are setting of into the unknown with the coalition - but independence of thought and opinion will continue here, though I'll not be unnecessarily unhelpful - apart from this ;-) .

PS I've a lot of work to make up after the last month, so forgive me if blogging is a bit more sparse. In many ways the next month or two will belong to Labour bloggers anyway as they try to react to their defeat and need for a new leader ( hint - this time try having an election ).

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

The CEP: Gordon Brown puts Scotland first

A bit behind already today, so here's a press release from the Campaign for an English Parliament - that has my support:



CEP Media Unit. for release: Tuesday 8am 7th July 2009

GORDON BROWN PUTS SCOTLAND FIRST, NOT BRITAIN.

“On the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the Scottish Parliament last Wednesday July 1st Gordon Brown published an article in the Scottish Daily Record,” stated Philippa Cullen of Lower Froyle in Hampshire in her end-of-month message to CEP members in the county. “It reeked with Scottish nationalism. Coming from a British Prime Minister who should put Britain first and speak equally of each nation of Britain it was outrageous. Yet it was totally very consistent indeed with his written pledge of March 31st 1989 when as ‘one of the leaders of Labour’s campaign for devolution’ he had signed the Scottish Claim of Right vowing ‘to make the interests of the Scottish people paramount in everything he said and did’. His government, he says, ‘has never stopped focusing on delivering for the Scottish people’.


“In the article he celebrated ‘Scotland’s rich and vibrant political history’. Eerily he talked of ‘the bravery and brilliance of Scots in uniform’, no mention of the English who make up the vast bulk of the British Army, Navy and Air Force. He described how he ‘had campaigned for a fairer future for Scotland’ and how he had made policy that ‘pays off for Scots. Our decision to build two state-of-the-art aircraft carriers at shipyards including Govan, Scotstoun and Rosyth has secured thousands of jobs in Scotland and protected Scots’ hard-earned savings’. He omitted to mention that the preservation of shipbuilding jobs in Scotland had been at the deliberate expense of England's shipyards, particualry Devonport and Tyneside.


“He exhibited breathtaking effrontery by saying that ‘the Scottish people rightly felt frustrated in recent decades as unpopular decisions were made on health, education and policing’, while knowing full well that his fellow Scottish Labour MPs in the UK parliament have taken away English MPs’ choice on foundation hospitals and university tuition fees by voting against them and imposing these against English wishes.


“Unashamedly he boasts that the Scots can enjoy ‘influencing decisions in Westminster’ while making no mention of the West Lothian Question. He trumpets on about ‘Scottish solutions to Scottish issues on things such as free personal care for the elderly, tuition fees, free travel for the elderly and prescription charges’, as if England doesn’t have exactly the same issues; and as if he is unaware, which he most definitely is not, that in terms of tax revenue it is the English taxpayer who pays for the extra benefits the Scots nosw enjoy. In terms of tax revenue Scotland is unable to pay its own way. ‘The Union Government invests billions of pounds in Scotland beyond the Scottish Parliament’s £35 billion annual budget’ he writes. What he does not write is that 90% of the Union Government’s revenue comes the English taxpayer.


Because of devolution Brown writes, ‘Scots could finally start taking more control of our daily lives’. Note his use of the word ‘our’. He smugly says “For the first time in 300 years, Scotland once again had its own parliament’. There is no fiercer opponent of England having its own parliament and the English having ‘control of their daily lives’. than him; and he is using all the instruments of the British state to try to make sure it never happens. He boasts of ‘hosting a working dinner in my home in Fife for leaders from all the Holyrood parties’. Would he ever as much as think of getting representatives of the people of England together ‘to focus on delivering for the English people’?


As Brown so rightly says in the article, more truthfully than he realizes: ‘In short, devolution gives Scotland the best of both worlds’


Contacts: Phiippa Cullen: Tel: 01420 23216 Email: imarcher@lineonee.net

Michael Knowles, CEP Media Unit. Tel: 01260 271139. email: michael-knowles@tiscali.co.uk

Monday, June 29, 2009

David Melding AM is right - federalism can save the Union

Just saw this article from a tweet from StGeorgeIsCross from Conservative assembly man David Melding, which reports on a book where he has suggested federalism for the UK, with England getting its political rights as a home nation.

This runs counter to Labour EU inspired balkanisation of England strategy and David Cameron's appeasement of Celtic nationalism strategy.

The reason is should work is that it creates symmetry, easily comprehended justice and equality of respect between the home nations.

The sooner it Conservative policy the better as far as I'm concerned.

Saturday, June 27, 2009

What about the legitimate pressure for self-government in England Mr Cameron ?

David Cameron is doing one of those mea cupla type things that are all the rage amongst our political classes these days.

He has told a BBC documentary (to be shown in Scotland only of course ) - "But I think where we went wrong was we should have spent more time in government thinking, how do we give legitimate help to those people within our United Kingdom who want to have a greater expression of self-government?"

So what about England then Mr Cameron ? Where the vast majority of people consistently tells pollsters they want an English Parliament ?

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

The Unionist case for an English Parliament

A bit busy today, but let me recommend the article by Andrew Morrison over on Conservative Home who moves towards making a Scottish Unionist argument for an English Parliament.

I think this is an important point, and not addressing it potentially one of the greatest mistakes we may make if we win power at the next general election.

My comment to the article is repeated below:

    Andrew - I think your article has a number of key insights and provides a warning to an incoming Conservative government.

    The Unionist argument for an English Parliament is not heard often enough. It provides equality of respect between the home nations and a sense of natural justice.

    It also removes one of the key drivers for the breakup of the UK which is the assumption that the now devolved administrations are different from the normal state.

    The trap David Cameron is currently walking into is that of again sacrificing English interests to appease Scotland. It will fail on two levels - first the injustice to the English and second the insult to the Scots who sense they are being bought off by someone who is willing to sell his own nation short.

    There is a great opportunity for the Conservatives to engage in UK wide constitutional reform, and establishing federal home nation parliaments should be part of that reform. And that means an English Parliament.

    It will certainly be better than waiting for the next socialist administration to try its hand, as they will be far more vindictive due to their natural conceit about knowing what's good for people.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Why Labour are really in favour of PR - their fear of England

Screen shot from Labour Home

Its all about trying to keep Labour in power .... The First Post's Mole made a similar point yesterday here...

This shows the straight dishonest about Labour's purpose. The current system that has allowed them absolute power for 12 years is about to kick them out, so they want to change the rules. Typical shameless Labour.

As it happens I think they are wrong. Any system of politics will establish and equilibrium.

If the desire of the English people to have their own parliament was honoured then a new type of Labour party - one with English rather than Celtic roots would emerge. It would win support in England and surely one day be in government. Events in Welsh and Scottish devolution have shown that even an established dominant party can be displaced within a home nations politics.


Monday, May 18, 2009

The next speaker must be English

Since Labour's anti-English devolution settlement and its campaign against the identity of England with is EU inspired regional balkanisation campaign England has never been in a position with less natural justice and more exploitation by the other members of the Union.

Its time that a convention was established where, as long as the British Parliament that sits in Westminster is the only Parliament that England has representation in that its speaker should be representing an English constituency.

The role of the speaker is about to get much more important with the next parliament for the English, even if we are to be currently denied our sovereign right and popular wish for our own Parliament - as is granted to all the other peoples of these isles.

The next speaker must be an MP for an English constituency and ideally be English.

Monday, April 21, 2008

An English Parliament could save the Union not destroy it

Just read an article on what is now at last being called "The English Question" by Philip Johnston in today's Telegraph where he tries to get away with dismissing the idea of an English Parliement as leading to the break up of the Union. Here's the comment I left ...

    Mr Johnston - you dismiss and English Parliament too quickly, and with unproven points.

    Creating an English Parliament would create symmetry. This would also provide a logical limit to the demand for powers from all the assemblies and parliaments. An English parliement would be beholden to a UK parliament in just the same way as say the Scottish is. If it doesn't work then it will fail for Scotland just as surely as for England. Devolution has placed the knife at the heart of the Union, not the English demand for justice.

    Let me offer another explanation. The problem is not an English Parliament (and government) demanding more powers, but exercising those powers it would receive if it were similarly constituted to the Scottish settlement.

    Most of what now passes for government activity would be carried out by English Executive. ( Education, health, housing, transport etc etc). What the British Political establishment fears (for which read Scots like Rifkind and Brown) is the loss of its right to rule England in a colonial fashion.

    An English parliament would save the Union and provide equality of respect between the home nations (we never hear that phrase these days). It would just be very bad for Celtic politicians who wish to play at ruling England.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

The hypocrisy of Gordon Brown and his anti-English (and Irish) plans

Gordon Brown is trying to save his own skin by rapping himself in the Union flag - see today's Telegraph here. Frankly the hypocrisy of the man who has done more than almost any other to destroy the Union to now try to claim to be its champion is almost beyond belief.

Not that I don't have anything else to do - but I had to fisk his article. Go on a read the comments its received and utter fury from other English people.

Man in a Shed is in favour of the Union - but will accept with good grace the wish of any of the other nations to leave and would wish them well. He is married to a Scot and has lived there for years - its a great place with wonderful people (except some of their self serving politicians ).

But Labour trying to politicise the idea of the Union will doom it to destruction, a process they started with their anti-English devolution settlement. Personally I believe it was fuelled by a desire to have fiefdoms for the Labour party where no Conservative government could ever interfere and still be able to win more than their share of UK elections.

Gordon Brown is the greatest Enemy of the United Kingdom - as his signing of the Scottish Claim of Right confirms.

Note also an indication that Labour are going to again try to balkanise England for their own political advantage.

Anyway - on with the Fisk of his article !

    More than a year ago I argued that a debate about the future of the United Kingdom was long overdue as people have finally rumbled the anti-English devolution settlement and my being an unelected Scot head of a defacto government of England were we didn't even win the most votes in a general election with a poor turnout.

    I suggested that, unless we start to focus more on what unites us than we do on what divides us like you being PM perhaps ?, there is a real risk that one day people will wake up and find that the benefits of the Union like the English paying for everyone else- which they had taken for granted for so long - had disappeared.

    I was accused of crying wolf - no you were accused of being a hypocrite - just as you accused John Major of crying Wolf when he said we had 24 hrs to save the Union before you came into power and broke it. But when secessionist forces are loudly at work it is not the time for silence and passivity - but you haven't been - your the one who made the problem in the first place !!!!. We must be resolute in defending the Union and argue against those who put it at risk the only way you could do this is by resigning.


    In these islands we have, over centuries, created the world's most successful multinational state because we celebrate and respect the multiple identities that enrich us all. I am Scottish and proud of it, but I am no less proud to be British - just as there are millions who are proud to be Welsh and British and English and British too - any seen the Irish ?.

    In recognition of this, 10 years ago we embarked on devolution fantastic bear face lie direct to our face - ensuring that the smaller nations that are part of the UK have more control over their own affairs can you see some sort of why England could never be allowed to be Tory have its own Parliament argument building up here ?. Devolution simply acknowledges the dual identities: Welsh and British, Scottish and British too What about the English !!! Are you so bigoted that you can't get the word out ?.

    Yet if, as I believe, the Union is a multiplier for good that too often and for too long has been taken for granted, then it is time now to explain how the Union can benefit all of us, and not at the expense of each other - its mostly at the expense of the English - you've made it into an abusive relationship.

    There is no Scotland-only, Wales-only, England-only solution to transnational challenges that range from terrorism to foot and mouth disease, and from avian flu to security and climate change. So for these islands an environmental Union, a security Union and a Union for defence is to the benefit of all This is really an argument as much for the EU as the UK - I'm sure Scots Nats would happily subscribe and suggest they can get all this from the EU - you must think you are talking to ignorant children.

    But what matters even more are the common values we share across the United
    Kingdom: values we have developed together over the years (300 of them - England on the other hand is over 1000 years old ) that are rooted in liberty, in fairness and tolerance, in enterprise, in civic initiative and internationalism Again mainly English virtues.

    These values live in the popularity of our common institutions from the NHS there are 4 NHS's - the least money per head being spent on the English one, the BBC the BBC has national units for everyone except England - just like its socialist pay masters, to the Queen - and even more recently in UK-wide support for the Olympics where every other part of the UK complains about London, Children in Need, Comic Relief, Make Poverty History that politics - and stupidity and
    action on climate change again politics and stupidity.

    We know also that we are stronger together because again and again each part of our country has benefited from innovations with origins in only one: the NHS founded by a Welshman; universal education with many of its earliest roots in Scotland; and universal suffrage championed by radicals in England. ( And how was the UK important here - I'm just asking as you make these points ? )

    In all these, and in many other instances, we did not lose because we worked together, but gained something greater than we could have achieved separately.

    The fact is, the Union is more like a covenant founded on shared values that have created bonds
    of belonging that make us all feel part of a wider Britain. Out of these bonds of belonging we have created not just the rights and responsibilities of a political citizenship but also of a social and
    economic citizenship too. But for the English who must be oppressed and bleed dry by punitive taxation, unfair distribution of resource and vindictive political spending against areas that don't vote Celtic Labour.

    So today, wherever and whoever you are in any part of the United Kingdom, you enjoy not only
    the right to liberty within the law but also the right to education, to healthcare, to help when unemployed and to a state pension and soon, for everyone, an occupational pension too. It is through such social insurance that all parts of the UK share risks and resources to provide
    security for each of us. ( Warning to the Scots - vote SNP and the English won't be there to bail out you socialist utopia and public sector run economy when the oil runs out )

    It is precisely because these shared values are so important and continue to flourish that it
    is possible to reconcile English, Scottish and Welsh pride with the progress of the Union - because the Union succeeds in combining recognition of separate national identities with the ideals and common values that reflect our wider Brutishness like the anti-English constitutional arrangement eh ?.

    Today Jack Straw the cabinet's token English person, Secretary for Justice, is consulting throughout the country on a statement of values that define British citizenship and on the
    case for a full British bill of rights and duties setting out rights and obligations for all citizens. He will of course not ask those who disagree with him - the English have never needed such a statement and certainly don't trust Labour to come up with it.

    The theme of the next stage of constitutional reform will be the empowerment of people ie the fudging of the issue- at local, regional WARNING - THIS IS LABOUR's next anti-English plan - destroy England with the British regions !!!! and national levels. So it makes sense also to look at the relationship between the nations and regions you can see what coming right ?and whether it strikes the right balance as we strive to meet and master new global challenges.

    The discussion about the future of Britain will succeed best if it is based on our shared values, and rooted in the hopes and aspirations for the future of people in every part of our country. So why are the English not asked - insulted and marginalised - is it because we don't vote for your party Mr Brown in large enough numbers ?

    There is a modern case for the Union, and it must be heard there was a case for the Union you broke Mr Brown - but you ignored it: it is not about partnership at the expense of pride, or about pride that can be satisfied only by sacrificing partnership ( you know what this means England and the English sacrifice - everyone one else cleans up ). Instead, it is to ensure that each region and nation of the United Kingdom flourishes within a covenant and in a partnership of equals for the benefit of all except of course England and the English.


    PS Anyone know what happened to http://www.toque.co.uk/witan today ?

Saturday, March 01, 2008

A Clockwork Clegg: Is there an English Lib Dem party - Nick Clegg says so !

Is there an English Lib Dem party - Nick Clegg says so !

Perhaps he just made a slip of the tongue, but also perhaps the Lib Dems are coming round to the idea of an English political identity - which surely leads to an English Parliament !

There may be hope. Iain Dale has been trying to persuade my party today - hopefully making some progress.