More mood music from shameless Labour

This time its immigration.

Gordon Brown regularly tries to get away with quoting that 3 million jobs have been created under Labour, ignoring the key fact that most of them have gone to immigrants. ( For reasons that are all to depressingly clear to those who are employers. )

Now Labour is trying to do a U-turn on immigration, saying it must be restricted.

When the Cosnervatives said this in 2005, the Labour party attack and distortion machine went ion to smear over drive, ably assisted by their vast army of supporters in the BBC. No Conservative spokesperson could saying anything without either being accused, or implied of racism ( whatever the subject they were speaking on ).

Now Phil Woolas is trying to say the same thing for new Labour.

This is because immigration is going up and employment is going down. Unfortunately many immigrants make better employees than the products of Labour all must have prizes education system.

Yet more mood music, yet more spin, yet more hypocrisy - yet more of Gordon Brown's New Labour.

PS I wonder if decks aren't being cleared for a snap election. ( I know the MSM has told us this won't happen, but Labour are dropping unpopular policies like sandbags out of a sinking balloon right now.)

Gordon Brown priorities cannot impact his own constituency or country

Just saw Gordon Brown insulting all the people of England with his arrogant answer to the version of the West Lothian question put to him at PMQs.

So what are his priorities to be ? (Don't even start me on the spin he's using to justify being rude to the Queen by trailing the Queens speech in the most blatant leak of all time.)

• Housing (Devolved to Scottish Parliament )
• Health (Devolved to Scottish Parliament )
• Education (Devolved to Scottish Parliament )

No wonder he want to take his ideas around the "British Regions" (the New Labour term for England ) - as none of his ideas will impact the constituency he represents !

Do none of the quisling Labour English MPs see what's wrong here ?

Blair the barrister - making the case for supporting failure

I started this morning with the pre announced news that Postman Pat was going to lay into support for marriage (ie promote his deputy leadership campaign for Labour party - maybe not just deputy).

Now Blair is on using his preferred trick for calling black white - that of redefining the question. He must have learnt this as a barrister - just make the best case for something, regardless of the logic of the situation. ( I'll go onto why this is the case in a minute).

It occurs to me that we should never have another barrister as prime minster again. Blair really thinks the spin and putting the best case for something makes it right - or else he is even more of an amoral monster that I am making him out to be.

Anyway Blair's spin was to say the supporting marriage wouldn't help young people who have gone of the rails. What he deliberately left out was that marriage creates better outcomes for bringing up children and that more marriage means less delinquency in the long run. So his line was to fix the symptoms - after all the suffering has happened - not the problem. Needless to say there none of this analysis over at the left wing BBC.

I sometimes wonder if NuLabour don't require a large amount of our society to be failing to give them a purpose and keep them all in the highly paid, guaranteed pension, jobs they have created for themselves.

But like many other NuLabour types Blair has put his own career in front of helping the disadvantaged and out country. I can't see how any moral or Christian person can support these self interested hypocrites.

Update: Northwing has a reasoned and more complete post on the subject in hand here..