Showing posts with label Pushing back the state. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pushing back the state. Show all posts

Friday, February 11, 2011

We should be fighting the tentacles of the parasite


I'm very disturbed by the news that the crude social engineering in university admissions for triangulation initiative is being permitted to appease the Lib Dems. What this really amounts to is quotas, where the government decides politically who deserves to go to which university.

This for of government favour will inevitably become a negotiating point as parties compete to exchange places for votes.

What is worse is its something Labour never dared to do in its 13 years in office. But now its been established and accepted by the Coalition, we can expect Labour to go further when they get back into power - which is very likely to be within the next five years.

The problem has been identified by Benedict Brogan well earlier this week - the tentacles of the state now reach everywhere. Everyone's a client - from tax credits, sure start centres, green energy subsidies, free other peoples cash for kids initiatives, bus passes for bribing voters etc. Just as everyone's a victim who need rights from the state to keep their place in society ( gays, students with poor grades but good political contacts (see David Miliband), Muslims, Atheists etc etc ).

Any if everyone's a client of the state, then they will vote for the party that keeps the state big and well fed - regardless of the fact it hurts more people than it helps ( you see socialism has figured out how to tie into peoples selfish nasty nature also ).

A Conservative government should be hacking of the tentacles of the state like a crazed axeman, because the pendulum will swing and soon Labour will be checking how their ratchet policies worked and planning the next step to universal poverty and destitution.

But being tied to the deadbeat Lib Dems is making that impossible. And if we can't do that effectively then we are doing more harm than good.

So whilst I was a supporter of the Coalition thinking the economic crisis demanded putting the nation first, I'm no longer convinced that's what we're doing and the concerns of not fighting the cancerous state back out weigh the issue of a potential crisis.

Perhaps the crisis can't be avoided any more, as without it no one will accept the necessary measures.

I asked myself at the start of this government if David Cameron would turn out to be more of a Ted Heath or a Margaret Thatcher - I'm afraid that thanks to Nick Clegg and the dismal Lib Dems it look like we've got a Ted and the big crisis will have to come to give us the government we need. That will take about 10 years and will lead to much suffering and anguish.

The priority for political activists on the right has to therefore be long term politics, a period of time in which party allegiance becomes a variable, because it looks very much like worse is yet to come. And to dig us out of the hole socialism and its appeasers are creating in this country is going to require coherent ideology and courage, not fuzzy triangulation and appeasement.

I've said before that in my nightmares Peter Hitchens is right. Well things are frightening enough, I'm now wondering why I can't wake up...

See also Simon Heffer today...

Monday, September 21, 2009

More tax for the South of England as Scotland enjoys tax freeze - thanks Lib Dems

So the Lib Dems plan to punish the English who live in the South of England, especially the South East whilst at the same time their Celtic heartlands enjoy that money being hosed around in Scotland and Wales.

They will whinge on about anyone with a big house being able to "afford it" - but lets remember that money that goes to the government to pay for places like 75% public sector employee zones in the North doesn't get spent in the economy of the South of England. ( Today we have the Bank of England, for example, explaining what the impact of people cutting back is likely to be on the economy ),

The money has been taken from all of us here - but the Lib Dems will use their normal dishonest arguments to try and pass this of as a victimless attack.

The Lib Dems aren't even planning on using it to fund Gordon Brown's rising national debt, but to pay for bribes for more votes for their party in areas of Labour's heartland where they fancy their chances.

Sunday, December 09, 2007

Pushing back the state

The news that the elderly who need care services are to be given cash to buy them is possibly the biggest shock to me of Brown's premiership. ( I wonder if it will be cash - or some bureaucratic central administered government scheme ? )

Think about it - this is vouchers for social care. Admitting that the state may not be the best provider. It runs against Brown's current trend to take more control over education.

What next ? cash for your health care treatment ( after all why not ? What's the logical or ethical difference ? )

Quite honestly this was unexpected from this Labour government who would no doubt have condemned the same idea if it had been made by a Tory. Given the strong link between social workers and the Labour party this is surely going to create a bit of a reaction. The cynical part of me wonders if this isn't an attempt to show the idea won't work to try to short circuit an anticipated Conservative election manifesto.

It is potentially very big news....its just being New Labour and Gordon Brown you know there has to be a catch or a trap somewhere.